Monday, 25 October 2021
Monday, 14 June 2021
The Archaeology Files - Hod Hill
Date of visit: 1 March 2020
Location: 3 miles north west of Blandford Forum, Dorset
Time period: Iron Age, c.800 BC to AD 43 (incorporating later Roman fortifications)
Type of site: Iron Age hillfort with Roman earthwork remains
Photos: Hod Hill site visit photo album
Hod Hill sits, like its twin hillfort Hambledon Hill, in the peaceful Dorset countryside, commanding a significant vista over its immediate hinterland. On first impressions, the hill must be high, for it is an exasperating climb to its 68-metre (223 feet) summit, made all-the-harder by thick, deep mud, which clings to your boots, and makes each step a struggle. I've come here on an early March day, following on from a tremendously wet winter, and many of the surrounding fields are flooded. Of course, weather like this would not have bothered the original inhabitants of the hillfort, who would have had little need to regularly traverse the steep slopes, but for the amateur archaeologist and enthusiastic visitor, the earthen trackway leading up to the hillfort entrance makes for a perilous expedition.
![]() |
| Aerial photo of Hod Hill, showing the extent of the Roman fort in the north west corner of the hillfort |
The literature will tell you that Hod Hill, at 22 hectares, is the largest hillfort in Dorset. I suppose they've done the maths on this, but I can't say it feels anywhere near the size of Maiden Castle, as I trudge across its sheep-filled interior. Maybe it's because the site is more square in shape, making up in width what it lacks in length, compared to its famous Dorchester sister. Hod Hill follows the general trend of all hillforts, being occupied by the fifth century BC (possibly earlier) and growing in population so that by the first century BC, its interior would have been covered by possibly hundreds of round huts, laid out in a rudimentary grid system. Here lived people of the Durotrige tribe, who inhabited what we now call Dorset and were, in my opinion, Britain's master hillfort builders. There are some mighty earth ramparts around the perimeter of this hillfort, which given the elevation of the site, is perhaps surprising, and suggests a paranoia amongst the population - which, to be fair, turned out to be entirely justified. I'm not going to discount the idea that some of the purpose of the ramparts was to discourage livestock from escaping - the steep hill here would make it very difficult and time-consuming to recapture escaped animals.
| Hod Hill - external ditch and ramparts |
Most hillforts appear to have been abandoned before the Roman invasion of AD 43, but at Hod Hill there is evidence of some resistance to the Roman Army, where eleven Roman ballista bolts have been recovered, apparently trained on one high-status round house, which is sometimes known as the "Chieftain's hut". It brings an uneasy feeling to mind, for here at Hod is the real impact of the Roman invasion, at least for those who resisted the invading force - men, woman, children and families doing their best to defend themselves and their home against a vastly superior military force which, after all, appeared on these shores without invitation. So far, no evidence has been discovered for a big massacre at Hod Hill, but archaeological investigation does show that there was a rapid abandonment of round houses when the Romans arrived - so perhaps the population surrendered and were allowed to leave, but only in a hurry.
So if this is the case, why were they made to leave so quickly? It was the responsibility of the Roman Legio II Augusta, under the control of the future Emperor Vespasian, to pacify the Durotriges and seize the hillforts in this part of the country. After Hod Hill was pacified and its occupants removed, the legion saw in the site an excellent strategic point, most likely due to its proximity to the River Stour, a trading route and potential military supply line. Consequentially, a fort was built within the parameter of the hillfort, centred on the north west corner of the site, to house a Legionary cohort (of around 500 men) and cavalry detachment (about 250 men - but imagine getting horses up-and-down this hill.) What makes this particularly fascinating is that the earthworks associated with the Roman fort still survive very clearly, especially in aerial photographs - although I found the site harder to interpret on the ground. As it happens, the Legionary cohort didn't stay here very long, abandoning the site in AD 51 as military priorities changed, and Legio II Augusta turned its sights further west, to the Dumnonii tribe, whose capital sat at what we now call Exeter.
| View from within the Roman section of the hillfort, looking east towards the Roman fortification - see below for photo location |
![]() |
| Plan of Hod Hill showing location of above photo (source: British History online) |
Sunday, 2 May 2021
The Archaeology Files - Trethevy Quoit
Date of visit: 25 April 2021
Location: East of the village of St Cleer, 2 miles north of Liskeard, Cornwall
Time period: Neolithic, 4,000 BC to 2,500 BC
Type of site: A well-preserved Neolithic portal dolmen burial chamber
Photos: Trethevy Quoit site visit photo album
Arriving at the five-space designated car park, the first thing you notice on a visit here are the signs indicating a World Heritage Site, not because of prehistoric monuments, but because of the mining landscape. The reminder of Cornwall's mining heritage is everywhere, dotted about the landscape in all directions. It's not the point of this site visit, but it is an interesting aside, and one that connects a more modern age with our ancient ancestors, through distinctive exploitation of the landscape. I wonder what heed the miners paid monuments such as Trethevy Quoit, and I wonder if it had any influence on their traditions and superstitions.
| Cornwall's rich mining heritage is evident all around, on a visit to Trethevy Quoit |
Trethevy Quoit is a very nicely-preserved portal dolmen, a type of monument quite specific to Cornwall (and more usually, western Cornwall - Trethevy Quoit is an anomaly, being so far east), dating to the early or middle Neolithic (3500-2500BC.) These structures are largely considered to be tombs, although it is not certain if this was their intended use - quite possibly they were multipurpose, or used in ceremony or worship.
![]() |
| Trethevy Quoit. Note the slightly raised ground around the base of the monument - possibly the remains of a mound or cairn which once covered the structure |
The structure consists of five standing stones, topped by a huge capstone (estimated to weigh 10.5 tons), which slopes downwards from back-to-front at a much steeper angle than was originally designed. This is because one of the supporting granite stones - the most westerly - collapsed at some point in the past, and now lies within the chamber itself. Had this stone continued to stand, the capstone would rest roughly horizontally on top. The structure stands 2.7 metres (9 feet) tall, and at its highest point, the capstone has a hole - possibly manmade - with one suggestion being that it was used for astronomical observations. It is thought that the chamber was originally covered by a mound or cairn - you can see this in the slight remains of a low mound at the sides and back of the structure, but not at the entrance. Local tradition states that the stones were set up by a giant, with the hole in the capstone being made by the giant's thumb, in order to lift the monument into its present position. It is from this legend that the site gets an alternative name, The Giant's House.
![]() |
| A sketch of Trethevy Quoit from 1848 (artist unknown) |
My overriding impression at Trethevy Quoit is one of awe, in how people managed to move such enormous hulks of granite - especially the raising of the capstone, and at a time when calories were so precious. I believe this boils down to two aspects - firstly, a community must have had enough sustenance, and been confident in the supply of that sustenance, to undertake this project. Second, a community must have had a complex level of organisation. Simply put, once agriculture was adopted at the onset of the Neolithic, human communities evolved to become more sedentary and organised. The supply of food was more reliable compared to the hunter-gatherer way of life, which in turn meant that communities started to lay down roots, explore myths, legends and spirituality associated with their immediate landscape, and began building monuments on a scale previously inaccessible. Of course, none of this takes away from the amazing manpower required to lift such huge stones without the use of modern machinery - we simply couldn't do it today.
In November 2017, Trethevy Quoit was added to Historic England's Heritage at Risk Register, due to the damage previously caused by fencing and increasing erosion by livestock. Nowadays, the site is fenced off in its own enclosure.
Tuesday, 27 April 2021
The Archaeology Files - Wayland's Smithy
Type of site: A well-preserved Neolithic long barrow of the Severn-Cotswolds tradition
On a crisp and misty March morning, you get a sense of the spiritual about Wayland's Smithy. The Neolithic long barrow is accessible via a two-mile walk across big, flat open fields. It's easy to think that nothing has changed since this monument was first created, for there seems to be an old and other-worldly atmosphere about the place, a far cry from the disruption of the modern world.
Wayland's Smithy is a chambered long barrow, built during the early Neolithic period. Long barrow construction was widespread across Britain and Europe at this time, although Wayland's Smithy belongs to a regional variant of long barrow style, the Severn-Cotswold group, of which is is one of the best surviving examples. The long barrow runs 55m in length, 14m wide, with a peristalith edging of slabs.
| Entrance Wayland's smithy long barrow, with two of the four sarsen stones in full view |
The tomb here actually forms two phases. The first monument was made largely of wood with some stone, and was built between 3590 and 3550 BC, eventually housing a single crouched burial, with the further remains of 14 people scattered in front of this. This tomb consisted of a paved stone floor with two large posts at either end, thought to support a timber facade. There was then a period of disuse, during which time the structure was covered by an oval mound of chalk and earth, signalling the closure of the barrow.
After around 100 years of disuse (possibly as little as 50 years), a larger barrow was built directly on top of this structure using stone, and probably twice the size of the original, between 3460 and 3400 BC. This is the structure that we see today. This tomb contained two transept chambers and a terminal chamber, along with the long entrance chamber - forming a rough cross shape. Today, the entrance is guarded by four sarsen stones (originally six), which were returned to their upright positions during archaeological excavation in 1962. Within this later tomb, archaeologists uncovered the jumbled remains of seven adults and one child.
| Entrance into the chamber area |
It is interesting that the transition from timber to stone at Wayland's Smithy took place over a relatively short period. It's also worth noting that the burials in the second tomb were late in use, compared with burials elsewhere - the famous long barrow at West Kennet had seen burials in stone tombs of this style at least 200 years earlier. I'm particularly interested in why the long barrow was re-opened after a period of closure, which must have spanned enough time for the use of the original to be outside living memory. I would suggest that the site had a symbolism and significance that had been collectively remembered, a legend passed down the generations which kept ancestral ties to the site intact, and made Wayland's Smithy an important one in the culture, heritage and tradition of the people.
Finally, a note on the unusual name of this long barrow - the name of Wayland's Smithy appears to come from a Saxon Charter of AD 955, which refers to the site as "Weland's Smithy". It is suggested that the site takes its name because it was once thought to have been the home of Wayland, the Saxon god of metal working. There is also a local tradition stating that if you were to leave your horse tethered to the long barrow along with a small coin, an invisible elvin smith would magically re-shoe your horse while you were away.
| Wider view of Wayland's Smithy |
Tuesday, 7 April 2020
The Archaeology Files - Knowlton Circles
Type of site: A series of Neolithic henge monuments, the best-preserved of which contains the remains of a Norman church in its centre
![]() |
| Knowlton Circles from the air, courtesy of English Heritage |
Knowlton Circles is a series of four Neolithic (4,000-2,500 BC) henge monuments, sitting in the landscape at the village of Knowlton, midway between Blandford Forum, Dorset, and Ringwood, Hampshire. Three of them are barely visible now, but the fourth one is beautifully preserved. Henges are a bit of a mystery to archaeologists - essentially, they are characterised by having a ring-shaped bank and ditch, within which is a relatively flat area (generally considered as more than 20m in diameter - smaller than this and they are termed hengiform monuments; larger and they are known as henge enclosures, such as the enormous example at Avebury.) Their purpose, like so much in prehistory, is a matter of debate - we've seen in a previous blog how the henge at Maumbury, Dorchester, made a perfect amphitheatre, and this seems like a natural conclusion for other henges too. We should always be wary of ascribing modern thought processes to the ancient past, so this isn't and shouldn't be the only interpretation, and archaeologists have also suggested ritual use and astronomical observation. What is agreed upon is that henges weren't occupied, and that they weren't used as defensive structures - not least because (notwithstanding the atypical example of the famous Stonehenge) the ditches of henges just about always occur on the inside of the bank. It's yet another mystery of prehistory that we can fascinate ourselves with.
Back to Knowlton, where most people's sole interest lies in the fourth henge, also called Church Henge, on account of the fact that in the 12th century, the Normans stuck a church in its centre. Some commentators believe that the church's location symbolises the transition from Paganism to Christianity, and I suppose it does in a way, although I've no idea if that was the exact intention of the Norman builders, given that England had been largely Christianised since Roman times. Having said that, something is clearly significant or spiritual about the site, which made it the right spot for Christian worship, and this is supported by the discovery, in 1958, of 16 Anglo-Saxon burials just to the east of the henge. The church itself was extensively remodelled in the centuries following the Norman Conquest, and despite the fact that the village was utterly devastated and left virtually deserted by the Black Death in the 14th century, the church continued to hold a congregation until the roof collapsed in the 18th century.
| Knowlton Church within its henge |
There's an irony to the idea that a church which was built to stamp on the identity of an ancient religion, now lies in ruins alongside it, and I don't think this should be overlooked when trying to describe the atmosphere of the site. My recent visit was on a bright, crisp March morning and I felt the site in perfect tranquillity, and would have been happy to linger. But some say that ancient melancholy hangs in the air here, and the site is reported to be one of the county's most haunted, with legends of phantom horsemen, a ghostly face that appears in the tower's top window, and the kneeling figure of a weeping woman, or nun, trying to purge herself of some unknown sin. I think for some, the unique atmosphere of Knowlton is rationalised through ghost stories, whereas my personal belief is that the history and ancientness of a place naturally means it will absorb the energy of human activity over the millennia. I'm pretty sure this is what I've felt on my visits here, to this wonderful, spiritual place.
| The ruins of Knowlton Norman church |
Friday, 13 March 2020
The Archaeology Files - Ackling Dyke
![]() |
| Ackling Dyke, where the course of the modern road departs from the Roman |
| Ackling Dyke preserved as slight earthworks at East Woodyates |
![]() |
| Various ways that Ackling Dyke is preserved in a short section of landscape at East Woodyates |
![]() |
| Ackling Dyke preserved in various ways on the approach to Old Sarum, Salisbury |
![]() |
| At Badbury Rings Ackling Dyke passes across the north west of the hillfort |
![]() |
| A second Roman road joins Ackling Dyke, as seen on the OS map of 1900 |










